The following information is from John Martineau’s
A Little Book of Coincidence in the Solar System
There really is no way here to recreate all of the beautiful drawings of the orbits of the planets and their precise geometric relationships to each other found in A Little Book of Coincidence . . . images far beyond words. A Litte Book is essential reading/viewing.
The following is not close to being the complete story . . . the evidence in Coincidence is overwhelming . . . but the few examples listed below should make the point. The accuracy of these drawings will also be addressed.
There are two examples from Coincidence that are included in THE PLANETS section. The first is a drawing depicting a large circle with three smaller circles of equal circumference within it that are tangent to each other, forming an equilateral triangle, while also being tangent to the larger circle. Another circle is now drawn through the centers of the three smaller circles, having the same center as the large circle. If the large circle represents the orbit of Venus, the inner circle represents the mean orbit of Mercury (99.9%).
The second example is the relationship between the orbits of Earth and Venus. If a line is drawn between Earth and Venus every two days over a period of 8 Earth years and 13 Venusian years, a beautiful pattern emerges that is similar to a 5-petaled flower . . . all Fibonacci numbers (99.6%).
There is also a drawing showing a large circle with a pentagon inscribed within it, another pentagon inscribed within the first, and a smaller circle inscribed within the smaller pentagon. If the larger circle represents the orbit of Venus, the smaller circle represents the orbit of Mercury (99.4% accuracy), and the empty space between Mercury and Venus (99.2%). This geometry also represents Earth and Mars relative mean orbits (99.7%). The second drawing has three nested pentagons inscribed within the larger circle, with the larger circle representing the orbit of Mars and the smaller circle representing the orbit of Venus (99.6%), as well as Ceres (a dwarf planet in the asteroid belt between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter) and Jupiter's mean orbit (99.6%).
Many drawings follow in Coincidence that I can not attempt to describe here, except to say that Mercury and Earth's physical sizes are in the same relation as their mean orbits, as well as the orbital relationships between Mercury, Venus and Earth represented by pentagons, octagons and squares (99.5% to 99.99%). Also, 'Earth and Saturn's relative orbits and sizes are both given by a 15-pointed star . . . a large circle representing the orbit and size of Saturn, with Earth's size and orbit represented by a smaller circle tangent to the lines of the 15-pointed star (% of accuracy not given).
There is a remarkable image of the orbits of Venus and Mars that involves a dodecahedron (99.98%), and Earth and Mars involving an icosahedron (99.99%). Other precise geometrical drawings represent the relationship between the orbits of Earth and Mars (99.9%), Mars and Jupiter (98.98%), and Earth and Jupiter (99.8%)
The size of the Moon to the Earth is 3:11 (99.9%). Also, '3:11 happens to be 27.3% and the Moon orbits the Earth every 27.3 days'.
I trust that the point is made. These examples go on and on and on and include geometric relationships between moons, between the planets and the asteroid belt, some including perfect golden ratio proportions. Coincidence is truly an overwhelming tour de force representing the precision and accuracy of the geometric relationships in our solar system.
None of these geometric relationships are normal . . . and none of what we see out there in the observed Universe is what we see here.
.